So, let's say the zombie apocalypse happens, everyone is panicking, and looting, and dying. Well, you can choose to remain by yourself, or stay with a group of others. Safety in numbers right? Well, not quite. The problem with the dead rising is that it only takes two idiots to turn an entire group of survivors into drunken looking idiots that want your flesh. One idiot has to die, then the other has to not shot him/her because they were friends or related, then the process continues until some one has enough brains to run for their lives. But, a group can offer less work and more weapons and carrying capacity for supplies, but the leaders of the zombie apocalypse are not your best bet. Take for example, The Governor from The Walking Dead, or Negan (also from The Walking Dead but only so far only in the comics.) Some times the man/woman your following is a raging sociopath, or a sadistic monster. But is a lone wolf really that much better? If your on your own with a zombie horde behind you, would the company of yourself be enough? The biggest problem of remaining a lone wolf is the fact that you would have to remain alone, with no one to talk to, not to mention you need to have the skill to avoid or kill any one who would want to take something from you. One against even just two is never good odds. Although being in a group is dangerous in it's own right, being a lone wolf could destroy you more mentally than a zombie could do physically.
That's all for now...
ノ┬─┬ノ ︵ ( \o°o)\
No comments:
Post a Comment